Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
November 10, 2005
I have uploaded a paper presented at an e-Government conference held in October 2005 at The Grand, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. The Conference "Conflux 2005" was a joint effort by Centre for Science, Development and Media Studies (CSDMS), Government of NCT
of Delhi along with Department of Information Technology, Government of India, UNDP, Danish Technological Institute and key academic and civil society organizations and various multilateral agencies.
The full presentation is uploaded at the following link
http://www.slideshare.net/susansharma/egovernance-for-conservation
The paper makes a case for the potential of e-Governance for creating jobs as a major byproduct. Giving livelihood options to fringe villages of national parks seems to be the only solution for avoiding man -animal conflicts and exploitation. If the livelihood
options are related to protecting the parks, it becomes a win -win situation for conservation and people.
I am throwing the paper for a "no-holds barred discussion "by IWC members. Please do add your valuable opinions.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 31, 2005
Well-known agricultural scientist and chairman, National Commission on Farmers, M. S. Swaminathan, has favoured construction of the Polavaram project and for that matter any big project, provided the environmental and social aspects are taken care of.
Speaking to reporters after meeting the Chief Minister, Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy, on Thursday, he said such big projects were the need of the hour in the light of the Bharat Nirman programme under which 1 crore hectares of additional ayacut would be brought
under the plough. It was not the first time that big projects were taken up in the world, he said, citing the Aswan Dam in Egypt and the Three Gorges project in China. Dr. Swaminathan, however, wanted a realistic assessment of benefits and risks before embarking
upon any big project. If a particular project displaced tribals and others and affected the environment, sufficient steps must be taken up. "It's a win-win situation for people and the environment. There is no free lunch." Asked to comment on Medha Patkar's
strong opposition to Polavaram project, he said, "some people are ideologically opposed to big dams and prefer smaller ones." He said his policies "are going on right direction." During the meeting, Dr Swaminathan and the Chief Minister discussed the need
for bridging the gaps between scientific knowledge and field-level needs.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 31, 2005
A day after the State Government secured the much-awaited environmental clearance for the Polavaram (Indirasagar) project, noted environmental activist Medha Patkar and the tribals facing displacement strongly opposed the Government's moves to go ahead
with the project. "What the project has secured from the Centre is only environmental clearance. But there is no forest clearance yet which is mandatory for any major dam," Ms. Medha Patkar said at an interface with the adivasis. Asserting that the project
was part of efforts to boost industrialisation at the expense of agriculture and tribal areas, she volunteered to spearhead the agitations to be launched by tribals against giving clearances to Indirasagar project in violation of the people's right to life
and the right to livelihood guaranteed by the Constitution.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 28, 2005
One of India's first river-linking projects, Polavaram, received the Centre's environmental clearance on 26th October 2005. The Pollavaram project(AP), renamed Indirasagar, aims at taking 80 TMC of water from river Godavari, the country's second-largest
river, to river Krishna. The multi-purpose project, when completed, will irrigate some three lakh hectares of farmland and generate 960 MW of power.
The revised project cost is Rs 13,000 crore, of which Rs 4,000 cr is to be used exclusively to address environmental issues, apart from relief and rehabilitation of 48,000 families across 288 habitations.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 23, 2005
Deliberations in a workshop on "Interlinking of Rivers: Doable and Desirable?" organized by the West Bengal Academy of Science and Technology. The main points are as follows:
- It was recognized that the parameters to determine water surplus and water scarce areas are contentious issues and the relevant data and details are not available in public domain
- The execution of this Mega Project requires consensus with the neighboring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and China
- Any withdrawal of water at Upper catchments deplete water resources downstream and changes river dynamics and parameters of his flood and delta plain
- The transfer of water from other basins even if doable, is unlikely to ameliorate the drought prone regions of the country for which local and regional watershed development and rain and surface water harvesting need to be practiced
- An assessment of present and optimal use is necessary within donor basis after ensuring that other cost effective alternatives for augmentation of water resources in receiving basins have been implemented and requirement of water scientifically assessed
so that such transfers are minimal and within say or similar agro-climatic zones.
Prof. Sisir K.Sen, Kolkatta
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 23, 2005
Below are objections raised by a group of learned men led by Shri V.B. Eswaran, Former Secretary, GOI and seconded by Dr. R.N. Athavale of Hyderabad (AP)and fifty others.
- A project that was not on the anvil has suddenly become the most important undertaking of the Government because of some observations of the Supreme Court on a writ petition; this seems to be the case of bypassing the Planning courses.
- The National Commission for Integrated Water Resources Development Plan in its report (September 1999) had observed that further studies were needed on the Himalayan Component and that in the Peninsular Component massive water transfers were not needed.
- The claim that the project will be a net generator of large quantities of electric power needs very careful examination. Even if all the rivers linking proposal are implemented, the contribution that this will make to the mitigation of floods may not be
substantial.
- The river linking project, if implemented, will take water only to a small part of the arid or drought prone areas, large parts of such areas will remain unserved and will have to meet their requirement through the local augmentation of water availability.
In arid or drought prone areas, the transported water made lead to the introduction of irrigated agriculture of a kind more appropriate to wet areas.
- Apart from its inevitable social and human impacts, the project is potentially fraught with serious environmental and ecological consequences that need to be studied and evaluated carefully.
- The announcement of a decision on a Mega Project in advance of the prescribed processes of preparation, examination, evaluation and clearance for each of the twenty or thirty projects included in it may reduce those processes to a mere formality. The feasibility
studies of proposed links should be put into the public domain for people of diverse disciplines and concerns outside the Government to examine and offer their comments.
- Intra basin disputes need to be tackled through the better, more economical and more cooperative management of the basin, rather than through imports of water from another basin. The project has already led to strong objections from several states and several
new inter-state conflicts may arise because of the project.
- If no transfers from the Ganga are envisaged, the Government should make clear to all as there is much expectation in the southern states of waters from the north. The huge costs involved in the linking of rivers and long distance water transfers will
make the water at the receiving and very costly.
- The Government, after examination of the issues as pointed out above, may explain the position suitably to the Supreme Court.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 23, 2005
Chapter 11 of the project report online lists the environmental and ecological aspects of the project. The K-B link project comprises a storage reservoir on Ken river and a 232 km long link canal to transfer surplus waters from Ken to Betwa river. Out
of the total submergence area of 8650 ha, 6400 ha is forest area. The region is covered by dense to moderate forests. The balance area of 2171 ha is cultivable area and an equivalent area of land has to be acquired for the displaced families.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 22, 2005
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 19, 2005
Kerala's rivers have a short running span but significant ecological functions to perform from their points of origin in the Western Ghats. Periyar, the longest river of the state with a 244-km stretch, has already lost 22 per cent of its average flow
due to diversions. Another river - Bharathapuzha - has its flow reduced by 12 per cent on its 209-km long journey to the sea. Chalakudy, the 140-km long river, has been the biggest victim with 37 per cent reduction in its natural flow. The Kerala Minister
for Water resources and forests has said the Union Government cannot take a unilateral stand on the proposed Pampa-Achenkoil Interlinking.
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
October 15, 2005
There is an urgent need for scientific study reports to be made available in the public domain. In the absence of transparency in big projects, media reports become the only source of news and these reports can be manipulated/used for political aims. Worse
still, extreme positions are taken by the affected parties with the result that sustainable solutions become difficult to implement
|