Centre shelves Pamba-Vaippar river-linking project (January Week 1 (2006))
The Union Government has shelved the controversial project to link the Pamba and Achenkovil rivers of Kerala with Vaippar river in Tamil Nadu, reports The Pioneer.
Mr Radhakrishnan said here on Wednesday that he had received a letter in this regard from Union Minister Sontosh Mohan Dev.
The Kerala Legislative Assembly and the State Government have been appealing to the Union Government to give up the river linking project.
The letter from the Union Government says: "It has taken note of the resolution of the Kerala Legislative Assembly and has decided not to treat the Pamba-Achenkovil-Vaippar Link as a priority link, for consensus-building purpose."
The letter also criticises the State Government's earlier stand and specifically mentions the role of former Water Resources Minister TM Jacob who had agreed to the project in 2003.
"After detailed deliberations of the 19th annual general meeting of the National Water Development Agency (NWDA) Society held on March 26, 2003, which was also attended by Mr TM Jacob, Minister for Water Resources, Government of Kerala, the president of the
Society decided that the NWDA and the Government of Kerala jointly carry out a study for the Pamba-Achenkovil and Vembanad wetland system.
The Government of Kerala subsequently expressed its inability to abide by the decision."
Terming the Union Government's decision to stop the project as a moral victory for Kerala, Mr Radhakrishnan thanked all the political parties and organisations for the combined effort in raising such a need. He also requested similar consensus on all matters
relating to changes in the age-old inter-state water-sharing agreements, which affect Kerala's interests badly.
Poacher Sansar Chand charged (January Week 1 (2006))
The Indian Express and The Telegraph reported that the CBI has filed a chargesheet against wildlife smuggler Sansar Chand and his four associates for poaching tigers from Sariska wildlife sanctuary.
CBI filed a chargesheet against wildlife smuggler Sansar Chand and his four associates under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) — used for the first time in wildlife cases — and Wildlife Protection Act for poaching of tigers in the Sariska tiger
Chand, also known as the Veerappan of north India, was arrested on June 30 last year. The CBI then took him in custody.
He is believed to have revealed during interrogation that an organised crime syndicate exists across wildlife reserves in the country
The chargesheet was filed on December 23. The court has posted the matter later this month for taking cognizance of the chargesheet. While under the Wildlife Protection Act (1972), maximum punishment for poaching doesn’t exceed seven years, if convicted under
MCOCA, the accused could be imprisoned for life.
Meanwhile, the SC today wanted the Madhya Pradesh government to hand over all wildlife cases related to Panna tiger reserve to the CBI. The Environment Ministry has already decided to ask CBI to investigate the poaching cases related to Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve.
Scheme to develop forests to be implemented (January Week 1 (2006))
As many as 26 forest divisions have been chosen by the Karnataka State Government under the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC)-funded scheme since May for sustainable development of forests. The Rs. 780-crore project is now named "Karnataka
Sustainable Forest Management and Bio-Diversity Conservation (KSFMBC) project."
Initially, only a few divisions covering a small number of districts were involved for sustainable development under the JBIC scheme. Later, the State Government included 26 forest divisions, including Madikeri and Virajpet divisions in Kodagu district.
The scheme became operational since May last. Progress was tardy in Kodagu owing to monsoon, but works have resumed, Madikeri Deputy Conservator of Forests, Range Gowda, told The Hindu .
Accordingly, different models have been worked out to ensure implementation of the scheme. As much as 250 hectares of forests will be developed in each of the 24 territorial divisions and two wildlife divisions selected under model I.
This Model involves natural forests, and planting tree saplings will be taken up to "fill the gaps." Similarly, under model IV, 293 hectares of forests will be developed in each of the 24 territorial divisions. This model will have forests which have less vegetation
than the model I. It might require more tree saplings to be planted to fill the gaps. Only local species will be planted under the programme.
The territorial divisions are: Belgaum, Gokak, Davangere, Kollegal, Chikmagalur, Koppa, Dharwad, Gadag, Haveri, Mysore, Hunsur, Hassan, Shimoga, Bhadravati, Sagar, Madikeri, Virajpet, Karwar, Haliyal, Yellapur, Honnavara, Sirsi, Mangalore and Kundapur.
The two wildlife divisions are Chamrajnagar and Dandeli, Mr. Gowda said. In the two wildlife divisions, the model IV forest development will not be taken up as also no village forest committees (VFCs) will be involved.
The VFC 's involved in the operations will get money in the scheme of things to protect the plants.
Nine VFCs each would be involved in 12 forest divisions, eight in 10 forest divisions and six in two forest divisions, he said.
In the second phase, (Project B) 14 divisions are being covered. A total of 4,000 hectares would be covered under model I and 7,000 hectares in model IV. It involves 100 VFCs. Mr. Gowda said.
Horseshoe crab: MoEF promises prompt action (Issue of the week, December Week 4 (2005))
Breaking its silence over the future of the endangered Horseshoe crab, the Ministry of Environment and Forest has promised prompt action to protect one of the earth’s oldest survivors.
‘‘We have received communications from the S&T ministry. Unfortunately, there is no status study yet on horseshoe crabs. We will initiate work soon and, unless any other agency comes forward, will involve the Wildlife Institute of India for the purpose. Once
we have the report, we will put the horseshoe crab in an appropriate schedule,’’ Director General (Wildlife) RP Katyal said.
The Indian Express had on December 21 reported how the MoEF was sitting on a proposal by Science and technology Minister Kapil Sibal to include the crab that has survived 16 ice ages, in Schedule IV to ensure protection and research. Claiming it would involve
research along the entire coastline, Katyal initially said a status report might take anything between six months to two years. Told that the dwindling crab population of just 3,000 found at a pocket along the Orissa coast, may become critically endangered
by that time, he opened up: ‘‘It’s true we don’t have much information about horseshoe crabs yet. We can certainly benefit by the work done by the CSIR scientists at Goa and Pune. We will also like to see the film made by Mike Pandey.’’
Mike Pandey, whose landmark film - Timeless Traveller - on horseshoe crabs has won nine top international awards, expressed satisfaction. ‘‘We make these films to generate awareness and save the species. The policy-makers are welcome to watch these. But I would
be happier if these films are also shown to the masses in national television,’’ he said.
Speaking from Goa’s National Institute of Oceanography, Dr Anil Chatterjee, who is researching on horseshoe crabs for years, offered all help to the MoEF. ‘‘We will certainly help to accelerate any process that secures the future of this unique creature,’’
At Goa lab, nine patents are filed and scientists are at the threshold of some path-breaking discoveries. Though being bred in labs at Goa, the absence of legal protection and the fact that they take about 10-12 years to reach sexual maturity, the horseshoe
crabs face danger of extinction in India.
Night of the Elephants (December Week 4 (2005))
In the backyards of Assam’s tea gardens, small-time solutions are laying ground for answers to the human-animal conflict. Jay Mazoomdaar of Indian Express reports.
Manbahadur Vishwakarma is too soft-spoken a man for his profession. Sitting next to a pile of sickles, swords and kukris, the village blacksmith of Kalamati, in upper Assam, closes his eyes and touches his forehead before breaking into a muffled monotone: ‘‘Ganesh
baba takes this alley to the village in the night. I peep through my door and pray: ‘Spare me and my hut, Ganesh baba, I never harmed you or anybody else’.’’ Till now, his prayers have been answered each night. Tomorrow is always another day.
A few yards from his hut, two village youngsters sound pragmatic. Santosh is a Bhumich and Rahul’s forefathers settled here from Nepal. ‘‘God or not, elephants should not be harmed. The (forest) department has finally put up an electric fencing. Hope it helps.’’
Otherwise, they will keep joining the villagers and create a racket with crackers and some plain shouting every night when the giants walk in. ‘‘That’s all we can do and hope the noise drives them away. We can’t fight them.’’
THEIR homes come in the way of the elephant corridor, their crop is fodder, their people easy casualty. ‘‘The problem is compounded by rapid loss or fragmentation of habitat and corridors. Elephants don’t roam about everywhere. Along the north bank of the Brahmaputra,
they use specific corridors to move from one forest pocket to another. If you encroach those corridors, conflict is bound to happen,’’ says Tariq Aziz, head of WWF-India’s Elephant and Rhino programmes.
Owner of 22 bigha paddy fields near Bhobla village, Khagen Chandra Das suffers about 50 per cent damage every year. ‘‘Do something. Anything. Farmers kill elephants in other states. And here nobody cares for us.’’
Sometimes, this anger boils over. And even gods are not immune to poison offered in the garb of delicious wheat dough. No wonder, Sonitpur district, the hotbed of human-elephant conflict in Assam, logged 32 elephant and 20 human deaths in 2003.
Last year, the count came down to 10 elephants and 15 human deaths, thanks to a WWF-sponsored project involving domesticated (kunki) elephants. This year, while 16 people died, only six elephants lost their lives. The basic strategy is simple:
• As a short-term measure, use kunkis to chase out wild herds back to forests. This minimises chances of casualty. Also experiments are on with innovative ideas like chilli fencing (with Bhut Jalokiya).
• The locals are also advised to brew away from the villages. Alcohol attracts these jumbos like nothing else and many have developed a taste for the local brew.
Bungling of funds in afforestation scheme (December Week 4 (2005))
The misappropriation in afforestation carried under the Japan bank-aided scheme in the state is not limited to the Pathankot forest range. The Tribune team visited the Mehengrowal forest range falling under the Hoshiarpur division.
Large areas in the range were brought under the Japan bank-aided afforestation scheme. The schemes were named as per the measurement of the land in which they were executed. The schemes comprised of 26 acre, 36 acre and 50 acre forest areas falling under the
Mehangrowal and other villages.
As per the norms about 5,00 sampling were planted per hectare in the said scheme. Under these parameters about 25,000 sampling were planted under 50 acre scheme, 18,300 in 36 acre schemes and 13,300 under 26 acre scheme.
However, few hundred plants were visible in the most of the schemes against thousands shown in papers. The condition was worse deep inside the forests. Deep inside the forests hardly any sampling had survived. Besides areas in which the plantations were carried
the path leading to areas was also infested by lantana. In some of the area the sapling were lying on the ground packed in plastic bags. The labourers employed had just thrown them on the ground rather sowing and taking care.
Most of the areas brought under the afforestation scheme in Mehengrowal range were fenced with cement pillars and wires to protect the saplings from animal. However, only two inch pillar stood at the spot. The wiring was missing.
Labourers employed by the Department of Forests to take care of plantation said that most of the sampling planted had perished due lack of maintenance. Nobody goes deep inside the forests to maintain the fresh sampling. So, whatever plantations were carried
out, have perished due wild growth of lantana and other shrubs.
Interestingly, the Department of Forests was supposed to take care of the plantations for five years. Budget of lakhs is spent every year for the maintenance of plantations carried out under the scheme.
The department claims the success rate of its plantations at above 90 per cent. However, the areas located deep in the forest not even 10 per cent of the plantations have survived.