Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 28, 2006
The term "greenbelt" refers to any area of undeveloped natural land that has been set aside near urban or developed land to provide open space, offer light recreational opportunities or contain development. The natural greenbelts along areas of Southeast
Asia’s coastlines, including the region’s mangrove forests, served as buffers and helped to prevent even greater loss of life from the December 2004 tsunami.
Greenbelts in and around urban areas have probably not saved any lives, but they are important nonetheless to the ecological health of any given region. The various plants and trees in greenbelts serve as organic sponges for various forms of pollution, and
as storehouses of carbon dioxide to help offset global warming.
Greenbelts are also important to help urban dwellers feel more connected to nature. Dr. S.C. Sharma of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research in India believes that all cities should "earmark certain areas for the development of greenbelts to
bring life and color to the cement concrete jungle and a healthy environment to the urbanities."
Greenbelts are also important in efforts to limit sprawl, which is the tendency for cities to spread out and encroach on rural lands and wildlife habitat.
The concept has also caught on in U.S and Canada, with cities adopting mandates for the creation of greenbelts to combat sprawl. Urban greenbelts can also be found in and around larger cities in Australia, New Zealand, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
The green belt concept has even spread to rural areas, such as in East Africa. Womens’ rights and environmental activist Wangari Maathai launched the Green Belt Movement in Kenya in 1977 as a grassroots tree-planting program to address the challenges of
deforestation, soil erosion and lack of water there. To date, her organization has overseen the planting of 40 million trees across Africa. In 2004 Maathai was the first environmentalist to be awarded the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize. Why "peace?" "There
can be no peace without equitable development and there can be no development without sustainable management of the environment in a democratic and peaceful space," said Maathai in her acceptance speech.
Source:E-the Environmental magazine
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 27, 2006
Delhi University has developed a technology to wipe out Lantana Camara, a weed which has created havoc invading millions of acres of deserted landscapes.
The technology prescribes cutting the plant from its roots and removing the 'copppising zone', which is normally buried inside the soil and is very crucial for the weeds life.
"The plant has to be cut in a manner so that its coppising zone is removed from inside the soil. Then the uprooted plant should be put upside down for a few days, so that it will be dead."Prof. C.R Babu, Project Director , The center for Environment Management
of degraded Ecosystem(CEMDE), said.
Lantana(exotic plant introduced by the Portugese in 19th century from South America) has the potential to kill the native plants where it grows. The fruits and flowers are not eaten by animals/birds.
|
Posted by
Susan
on
December 23, 2006
"It is absolutely true that in biodiversity rich areas, the poorest people are living. But can we say that since these people
are poor (in the connotation of the modern societies), they have developed the knowledge of harnessing their sustenance from their surroundings and thereby made these areas biodiversity rich? The so called modern civilization is continuously trying to change
nature and is in turn destroying the biodiversity (including agricultural biodiversity) for a so called globalized modern living. Now in India most of these biodiversity rich areas are exploited by modern man for other resources like minerals in Central India
and timber in North East.
From our experience with tribal communities in Jharkhand, West Bengal and Tripura, we found that many villages are changing their
livelihoods at a fast rate to catch up with the rest of modern India and in the process are forgetting their traditional knowledge of sustainable use of natural resources. The best example of this is that the social life of the tribal residing near mining
areas is now entirely different from that of their relatives residing in the forest areas in far away places. Now within the tribal society, they think that persons working as a labourer for all 365 days is better off since he has more money than a person
with food security (of a different kind in a biodiversity rich zone). Slowly these changes are percolating and people are forgetting their traditional knowledge with the advent of more and more infrastructure, mining and other projects.
On the other hand, in the mining areas of Birbhum, West Bengal, we found (ironically) that now after 30 years of the start of
mining, they are regretting having adopted and accepted changes which made them dependent on the whims of mine owners. Most of these mines are illegal and these tribals are still poverty stricken and are also having diseases. But the damage has already been
done.
I feel that without addressing livelihood issues, it is a difficult proposition to expect the community to protect traditional
knowledge, as other external economic forces are forcing them to do otherwise.
A continuous campaign is required to propagate the intrinsic value of these biodiversity rich areas and addressing their needs through a consultative mechanism. Detailed scientific mapping of traditional knowledge is necessary to protect biodiversity
in areas where such distortions are taking place."
-Sujit Choudhury,
PAN Network,
Kolkata
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 23, 2006
Barasingha in Kanha N.P and Hangul in Dachigam N. P ( J&K)
The barasingha, the beautiful deer with twelve tined antlers, were once reduced to just 66 animals in Kanha N.P. Management interventions like construction of a large enclosure,( main threat to brasingha are the tigers) strict control over grass burning
and the augmentation of grassland areas achieved a rebound of the population of this deer.
Today, the Hangul or red deer in Dachigam is faced with extinction. The 2005 census placed their numbers between 170 and 250. Increase in predators like leopards and the omnivorous black bear who feed on young hangul does not help matters
either. Large scale grazing of sheep and encroahment in the upper reaches of the park have led to shrinking of the hangul's home range, making it easy prey for leopards in the lower reaches. The Wildlife Institute of India Are doing satellite tracking to determine
the home range. Deending on the results a decision has to be made to increase the coverage area or to relocate the predator population.
( Source: Kanha Tiger Reserve by Carrol Moulton and Ernie J. Hulsey and
The Indian Express 22 Dec 2006)
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 19, 2006
Tribal rights Bill Passed
The law which gives tribals rights to forest land is expected to cover nearly ten lakh tribals and traditional forest-dwellers living in 87 districts of the country. Only those who have been residing in forests for three generations or 75 years will be eligible
to claim land. Each such family would be entitled to four hectares of forest land. The total land that dwellers are estimated to get is two percent of the forest land.
But the government has retained the power to acquire forest land with tribals for the construction of schools, hospitals and to provide other basic facilities.
Rights over land and minor produce
The gram sabha will determine the nature and extent of individual or community forest rights. The gram sabha will then pass a resolution for conferring the rights and it will be forwarded to a Sub-Divisional level committee. The rights will be conferred
by a District Level Committee to be apointed by the state government.
Source: The Hindustan Times and The Indian Express
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 12, 2006
Singapore and Hong Kong have long competed for the title of Asia’s premier financial centre and favoured destination for foreign professionals.
Singapore’s claim received a boost in November when Merrill Lynch, an American investment bank, declared that Hong Kong's air pollution was so bad that investors should sell shares in developers there and buy shares in their Singaporean rivals. Spencer White,
the bank's analyst, also forecast that Hong Kong office rents might fall 5% in 2007.
Singapore has its own air-pollution problems, but this is usually an annual bout of so-called “haze”, caused by farmers in neighbouring Indonesia setting fire to tropical forests to clear land. Hong
Kong’s problem, by contrast, is a year-round miasma churned out mainly by factories on the Chinese mainland. “About 40% of those in my social circle who work in the financial sector are looking to leave [Hong Kong] because of the pollution,” Mr White told
a Singaporean newspaper. His investment advice was nothing more than “common sense”, he said, and he predicted Singapore would benefit as more people move there.
Source: Economist.com
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 12, 2006
"The fact is that warming of the global atmosphere is possibly the biggest and most difficult economic and political issue the world has ever needed to confront. I say this because, firstly, emissions of carbon dioxide are directly linked to economic growth.
Therefore, growth as we know is on the line. We will have to reinvent what we do and how we do it. There will be costs, but as Stern says, the cost will be a fraction of what we will need to spend in the future.
Secondly, the issue is about sharing that growth between nations and between people. The fact is that global economic wealth is highly skewed. Put in climate terms, this means that global emissions are also highly skewed. The question now is whether the
world will share the right to emit (or pollute) or will it freeze inequities. The question is if the rich world, which has accumulated a huge 'natural debt' overdrawing on its share of the global commons, will repay it so that the poorer world can grow, using
the same ecological space?
Thirdly, climate change is about international cooperation. The fact is that climate change teaches us more than anything else that the world is one; if the rich world pumped in excessive quantities of carbon dioxide yesterday, the emerging rich world will
do so today. It also tells us the only way to build controls will be to ensure there is fairness and equity, so that this biggest cooperative enterprise is possible. Think of climate change as the fallout of the feverish embracing of the market.
............................................
Ultimately, climate change is the true globaliser. It forces our world to come together not just to make short-term profits for some, but long-term economic and ecological benefits for all. Let us continue to discuss how this can be done."
Source:
Sunita Narain
in
www.downtoearth.org.in/
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 10, 2006
The Delhi Wildlife Department rescued seven owls belonging to the species" Indian Horned Owl", in Old Delhi.
The seizure has brought to light a racket run in the name of black-magic.
According to wildlife experts, the owls are not captured for their meat but to perform rituals. The claws of the bird are thought to attract good fortune while feathers are used to ward off evil spirits. Tantriks cash upon mythology where owl is considered
the vehicle of goddess Lakshmi.
Source: The Indian Express dated 8th Dec, 2006
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 10, 2006
The headlines scream of a seething Singur in Calcutta, where Tatamotors are acquiring land to set up an automotive plant. The settlement to the farmers is handsome, yet farmers ask,"What use is cash?"
The echoes of these feelings are heard in a faraway consumeristic land in a different form. America.
Americans have increased the conservation of private lands by more than 50 percent in just five years. Currently about 37 million acres of private land has been set aside as natural areas. Factors contributing to the increase in private lands conservation
include towns wanting to preserve their quality of life, state and local open space bond initiatives, and policymakers concerned about sprawl and unchecked development.
Sources: Business Standard, 10 Dec, 2006 and lta.org/census
|
Posted by
Susan Sharma
on
December 07, 2006
The award of the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize to Muhammad Yunus is a tremendous accomplishment for the founder of Grameen Bank, Bangladesh and for the field of social entrepreneurship.
The media describes Yunus as an economist, professor, or banker, but really why the Nobel Committee selected him is because Yunus is the quintessential global social entrepreneur. His brilliant microcredit strategy is based on unleashing the potential of
every person to change his or her life.
|